That’s exactly the catch. Monaco is not for people who want to work or build a career. It’s more like a retirement haven for the ultra-wealthy or a tax shelter. Sure, the luxury is tempting, but the restrictions on employment might make it boring after a while.
I’m skeptical about the real impact on strengthening international relations. It’s a nice thought, but the effect of individual exchanges on broader diplomatic ties may be overstated.
Disagree with this CAP. It's a SHORT-SIGHTED move. Canada thrives because of diversity and international talent. We're sending the WRONG MESSAGE to the world. This will hurt not just the universities but our reputation as an inclusive nation.
I DISAGREE with the notion that additional lotteries are beneficial. It just adds more stress and uncertainty to the process. Employers and candidates alike are left in a limbo, waiting for a decision that could dramatically impact their futures.
I disagree with the new investment thresholds for the Golden Visa program. Increasing the minimum investment to EUR 800,000 in popular areas like Athens and Mykonos will deter many potential investors. 😠
I disagree, Sarah. The changes might seem beneficial in the short term, but in the long run, they could slow down the response to labour market changes, affecting productivity and growth in certain industries.
Disagreeing with the notion that this reform is wholly positive, the introduction of such stringent measures for 'guest workers' could backfire, exacerbating labor shortages in sectors that traditionally rely on this class of workers. It’s a risky gamble that might not pay off.
ABSOLUTELY DISAGREE with this move. It’s a step BACKWARDS. Making it harder to attract global talent will only HURT the tech industry. Smaller firms and startups OUTSIDE London will SUFFER the most. We need DIVERSITY in skills and thinking to DRIVE innovation, not just high salaries!
I disagree with the notion that traveling back to France with a pending permit is overly complicated. It’s all about having the right documents and following the process. The French authorities aren’t looking to make life difficult for genuine cases.
I disagree with the whole approach! Why are we always following and not leading? The real issue isn’t just funding but creating a sustainable ecosystem.
Disagreeing here, but isn't extending the deadline just postponing the inevitable? What about after June 2024? Will there be another extension, or are we looking at a potential crisis?
I DISAGREE with the view that this policy enhances security. It's just another bureaucratic layer that complicates travel without real benefits. Isn’t Europe supposed to be about open borders and unity? Why this sudden shift back to stringent nationalism?
I actually disagree with everyone saying this is a positive change. Limiting it to only principal applicants and leaving dependents out is just another way of complicating the process for families. I don’t think this solves the bigger problem.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.