I disagree with the idea that cash is becoming irrelevant. Millions of people still depend on it. Not everyone has reliable internet access, banking services, or even a smartphone. A fully cashless system could leave many people behind.
I disagree with the idea that this is enough support. A one time extension only delays the uncertainty for many applicants. If the situation that triggered the measures still exists, then stricter limitations may create more stress rather than stability.
I disagree with some of the comments here. There is a difference between setting healthy boundaries and completely checking out. If employees stop caring about the success of the company, eventually that affects everyone including coworkers. Commitment still matters.
I disagree a bit. People always mention the tax benefits but ignore how annoying the paperwork can become. Apostille mistakes, translation problems, renewal every 2 years... not exactly stress free for retirees.
Disagreeing with the overly optimistic views. Let's not forget the inherent risks of infrastructure investments. Delays, budget issues, and even political changes can drastically affect outcomes.
Disagree. This whole thing just adds more bureaucracy. Most small companies don’t even understand the conciliation procedure between authorities. It’s going to slow down projects and make cross-border work even more of a nightmare.
I don’t agree that it’s “not too hard.” Every voivodeship interprets the rules differently! Try applying in Poznań and then Kraków — completely different document lists. It’s inefficient and confusing. The EU should have standardized guidance on this, not leave it up to local offices.
I don’t agree this will be a “game changer.” Extending Mission Visas to free zones helps on paper, but the implementation delays and lack of digital systems will frustrate companies. Without clarity on renewals and quotas, it’s just policy talk, not real reform.
I have to disagree a little. Online dating can create a false sense of endless options. It leads to people being more dismissive. It’s like, why work through one issue when you have a hundred more matches waiting?
I disagree with the salary requirement change. It excludes many qualified professionals who might not meet the basic salary threshold but are otherwise highly skilled. This could deter talent rather than attract it.
Tina, that's a nice quote, but we can’t overlook the fact that it’s still a high-risk investment. Not every investor has a guaranteed path to residency, and some could lose their money. Let’s not just focus on the positives without acknowledging the potential negatives!
I DISAGREE with the notion that the process is entirely digital. My cousin had to appear in person because they needed additional verification due to discrepancies in the documents. This kind of defeats the purpose of an online system if you end up needing to visit the office anyway.
I disagree to some extent. While there may be delays, I think it’s manageable if you plan ahead. My friend got their visa within 3 months. It’s not lightning-fast, but it’s not the end of the world either.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.