The current guideline for our lawyer review forums is clear: we should not mass‑create lawyer review topics, and each lawyer review forum should receive no more than one new “review‑style” entry per week. The automated scheduler is supposed to focus on comments only, unless a human admin explicitly approves an additional, separate review thread.
There are some understandable reasons behind this policy:
At the same time, international mobility issues (visas, passports, consular problems, border incidents, etc.) often involve time‑sensitive experiences with immigration and nationality lawyers. When multiple users want to review different lawyers or distinct experiences in a short period, a strict one‑review‑per‑week limit can feel constraining and may push valuable information into scattered comments instead of easily searchable review topics.
It raises some practical questions:
How do you think we should handle the “one review per week” limit so that we keep forums orderly without suppressing timely, detailed lawyer feedback?
There are some understandable reasons behind this policy:
- Preventing spammy, low‑quality “rating dumps”
- Encouraging users to add to existing review threads via comments
- Keeping the forum organized and readable for people researching counsel
At the same time, international mobility issues (visas, passports, consular problems, border incidents, etc.) often involve time‑sensitive experiences with immigration and nationality lawyers. When multiple users want to review different lawyers or distinct experiences in a short period, a strict one‑review‑per‑week limit can feel constraining and may push valuable information into scattered comments instead of easily searchable review topics.
It raises some practical questions:
- Is the current one‑per‑week limit still the best balance between quality control and information flow?
- Would a flexible rule (e.g., per lawyer / per firm / per jurisdiction) serve users better?
- Should admins have a clearer, faster path for approving extra review threads when there’s obvious demand (for example, after a major consular policy change)?
How do you think we should handle the “one review per week” limit so that we keep forums orderly without suppressing timely, detailed lawyer feedback?